http://april.stepitup2007.org/article.ph...
They mask this under the words, “its’ only 2 percent reduction per year.
So lets be honest ok? By 2010 just 2 years, what do we have to replace the 4% reduction in gas, oil or coal That is ready our ONLY source of electric power generation?
By 2015 we are now up to almost 15 % less elec being produced by coal, all the while power consumption has been increasing. What do we have and where will it is placed, with the fighting already taking place over the placement wind turbines, etc.
Please don’t waste anyone’s time talking solar. You could cover the whole southwest of the US with solar panels and still not have enough production to replace 3 percent let alone 15 pecent
So what are these green %26#039;supper ideals%26#039;, as well as where will they be built in order to reduce the emissions while at the same time Not sending us back 500 years or even worse. 500 years ago people where allowed to heat their homes and cook their food with coal or wood, you propose stopping that all together.
Additional Details
3 months ago
Well apparently either no one has a real answer or they are just sitting on it. Nuclear is not an option. We know the few loud mouths won%26#039;t allow it.As far as solar, I have found nothing.
3 months ago
So by following Dana%26#039;s ideal, we would only need just a part of what they show, since there would be no place left to live right?http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/04/...