Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
You need to argue it this way:%26quot;I%26#039;m not against Conservation... conserving resources often makes good economic and aesthetic sense.
However, if the implication is that being against %26#039;Conservation%26#039; means that I am against making reasoned and logical decisions on basic means of progression simply because any environmental effect exists, then yes, I am against that sort of %26#039;Conservation%26#039;%26quot;
Point out how much the extremism on environmental issues really costs society, businesses, and finally ourselves. Bring it home to each person%26#039;s pocketbook. 40% 2 Votes
Other Answers (6)
-
srry... donno..
0% 0 Votes
-
that means you will be an enemy of Nature ,better change sides ,before you get sacrificed to the gods,
Nature ,especially the forrests is our life insurance ,with out it we dont exist ,neither does anything else
No water ,No rivers ,no food ,no clouds ,no air to breathe,cook in the day and freeze in the night ,but we would be gone long before Nature has gone 0% 0 Votes -
I%26#039;m not against conservation and I can%26#039;t really see many people actively being against it, but for some economic reasons might make them unwilling to take part in conservation.
E.g. a construction company wanting to build houses on land, may not see conservation in the area as a good way to spend their budget.
I live in a conservation area and we have to get permission to cut trees down in our gardens, but many people don%26#039;t bother and just chop them down anyway because they want more light or space. I think this is just down to lack of knowledge about the conservation laws and conservation in general.
If someone doesn%26#039;t know what conservation means or what is involved, they are not going to want to, or be able, to take part. This doesn%26#039;t make them %26quot;against%26quot; it per se, but means they do not have the understanding to be %26quot;for%26quot; it. 20% 1 Vote -
I wish I could help you out with that, but the only reason I think people don%26#039;t conserve is because they are lazy or they think that they aren%26#039;t saving future generations, they%26#039;re just making theirselves live on a lower quality.
0% 0 Votes
-
Global Ethics, what right does mankind have to intervene with the cycle of nature. this planet has evolved over time with the one rule, survival of the fittest, every spieces must either overcome and adapt, or face extinction.
what right does any man have trying to preserve any spieces that can not keep up with the ever evolving world. this is a rock solid argument
I was on the debate team when I was still in school 20% 1 Vote -
you live once -live it. There will always be a war or disease to wipe us out - new species will survive in the new environment. Now before you laugh off what I said as me being ignorant, think of what I said - life forms cycle in different situations. What is toxic to one and nature beauty to the next. We have less impact to the earth and universe than we realize. We just think our form is holy - and we must maintain holy ground - Get bent- Just a simple shift in the basic strings of energy and our music stops
20% 1 Vote