Other Answers (10)

• This question is a trap because the house of neither one has been shown to be anti-environment! People are part of the environment too! As long as they do not produce irritants or deadly pollutants they are fine.
  
  The %26#039;smuggled%26#039; assumption is that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is anti environment! Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 promotes plant growth and is produced by natural means, such as breathing and the warming of the oceans salt water. The legal system and basic logic prevents accusations not substantiate by facts. Any text on plant growth shows plants use CO2 and convert it to Oxygen whereas humans do the opposite!
  
  http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/23/us/23c...
• I would have to say that Al Gore%26#039;s house is the most environmentally unfriendly house of the two. Every thing that I have heard about Bush and his ranch is that it is an operating ranch so you have to be friendly to the environment to raise cattle in Texas.
• Al Gore may deserve an honest investigation into the subject, but he doesn%26#039;t benefit from a 5 minute peek at the facts. His behavior is truly shameful in light of his personal hypocrisy.
• Bush does.
  Only we commoners have to comply, not the elite.
  Algore%26#039;s mission statement: do as i say, not as I do.
• Sorry but everyone will have to bash Al Gore (The Environmental Wh%26amp;ore) as he is the world%26#039;s biggest lier (Lying Al Gore the internet inventor) and and (lying Al Gore, the energy credit claimer) . He is just so bad. He deserves nothing but derision. Sorry - We would like to be positive but there is absolutely nothing to be positive about.