One type of recycling I agree with is aluminum. Reusing it takes way less energy than mining and purifing new ore.
Recycling glass is not practical though. You make glass out of sand, and you can find sand anywhere. Recycling old glass takes more energy than making new glass. This means that you actually waste energy, going against the whole principle of recycling.
If this sounds familiar, it was in a book I recently read by G. Gordon Liddy.
anywho, do you agree disagree, or just not give a fu%26lt;k?
http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts/...
http://www.deq.state.mt.us/Recycle/Glass...
http://www.epa.gov/msw/glass.htm
http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/Home/Toolsand...
Google glass recycling energy for lots more.
It%26#039;s better to get facts on environmental issues from scientists, and not political hacks. And to always research the information further.
That%26#039;s really the whole point of recycling, not how to make a profit off of it.
Whether it takes more energy or not, I don%26#039;t know as I%26#039;ve haven%26#039;t seen any studies, nor have I read the Liddy material you refer to.
If it truly takes more enery to recycle glass than to make new glass, then yes, in and of itself in that context I would agree it doesn%26#039;t make sense.
Whether I could agree to that in absolute terms would require a lot more information and facts than are in your question.
Maybe everything that is recycled should be studied and compared then information given to the public and let them decide if they want to recycle a certain material or not . If its better to just trash it then so be it
