Best Answer
Makes sense to me.Changing the content of the atmosphere is probably something we should avoid, even if the effects of CO2 are being overstated. Being a little more energy efficient is something that makes sense economically as well.
I don%26#039;t like these doomsday, tipping point claims that people make but can%26#039;t back up. I also don%26#039;t like the way researchers are approaching global warming as something they need to prove rather than something to be researched with an open mind.
Other Answers (2)
-
Sure, that seems reasonable. All I would say about the global warming thing is, fault doesn%26#039;t matter, but facts do. if we don%26#039;t want it hotter, wetter, whatever (and any measurable change will affect someone), then we need to think about what we can do to keep things like they are.
personally, I don%26#039;t doubt that there IS global warming, but I think humankind is only ONE of the causes, and frankly, the only one we can do anything about.
Fair enough? -
global warming has to be proven because people believe if it came from a democrat its not true, or maybe they%26#039;re just in deep denial. Either way I believe it.
