Do you think that in another 100 years time?
countries will have had to revert back to horse power due to global warming issues?
If we can%26#039;t move any further forward then we obviously have to move back to natural ways of transport to avoid any further pollution of the planet.
What do you think?
The trouble with Humanism is that it puts too much emphasis on the %26quot;power of humans to change the world (planet)%26quot; which is nonsense. Nothing we can do will change the climate, either hotter, or colder. This happens in cycles naturally, and always has, always will. People were worried about global warming back in the 1920%26#039;s, then with global cooling in the 1960%26#039;s, now again with global warming in the 1990%26#039;s into the 2000%26#039;s. God bless.
it%26#039;s hard to say, only if people do something know, like i just saw on the news and the increase in polar bears are decreasing by a big amount each day, like if we do, we will have some big challenges and struggles
horses eat quite a bit. electric and hydrogen vehicles is my bet for the lucky survivors.
also, the question is a bit euro-centric; there are still plenty of places where horse or rather donkey power is a luxury, women still pull ploughs and dig with sticks.
I think that our scientists will find a way to make a car or vehicle that works on alternative resources.
One of the unknowns (besides whether global warming will be controlled) is whether a practical alternative energy source will be discovered. Right after the 2nd World War, there was a gush of optimism that atomic power would serve. You can see that in the science fiction stories of the period. That just didn%26#039;t work out, small, light, safe, cheap fission engines are just not part of existing, or foreseeable technology. The other difficulty is that both uranium (and thorium) are only available in limited quantity. We would soon reach and pass peak uranium should a major push go that way. But fusion may be possible. However it is not something to count on.
I think, should we manage to burn all our fossil fuels, we will fall back on biofuels and conventional alternatives like wind, solar, and hydropower. That will be combined with much more efficient machines and nonsense like using biofuels to fly jets will not happen. We may see commercial sailing ships again, clippers even.
I would expect to see a considerable reduction in human population as we adjust to the limits of our new circumstances. It should be a much more peaceful world, war requires a LOT of energy, and a few plodding cart horses will fit right in.
In another 100 years are we going to be alive....I don%26#039;t think so....and as selfish as we are....we don%26#039;t care...because if we did care we would allow for wind, water, steam, off shore drilling, nuclear, and solar panels and anything else I did not mention to proceed forward...the Golden Gate Bridge was built in 2-3 years....you cannot plan a fart in that time in this selfish self-centered society
we are not going to be here if we cant help our planet
No.
No but we will all convert to electric cars and or hybrids.
i think life will be very different in 100 years time but it will have bugger all to do with global warming
It almost feels like sometimes they want us to move back to the stone age.
Society has made that pretty impossible. Most people have at least a 30 minute drive to work, which would be impractical and impossible via horse every day. We%26#039;ll never go back, we%26#039;ll just move forward until we explode.
No people will realise that it is total tosh and the planet is a living thing alot bigger than the human race.As the sea contributes more co2 than anything else on the planet why isn%26#039;t it taxed
