So basically this whole %26#039;scientists predicted global cooling%26#039; crap we keep hearing from the %26#039;skeptics%26#039; and deniers is yet another myth, based on one article in Newsweek, which is not even a scientific journal.
Of course, deniers always seem to put more credence in what the media says than what scientific journals say.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cool...
that is about as serious as the ice age predictions ever got as far as i know.
%26quot;In the 1970s, there was a book in the popular press, a few articles in popular magazines, and a small amount of scientific speculation based on the recently discovered glacial cycles and the recent slight cooling trend from air pollution blocking the sunlight. There were no daily headlines. There was no avalanche of scientific articles. There were no United Nations treaties or commissions. No G8 summits on the dangers and possible solutions. No institutional pronouncements. You could find broader %26quot;consensus%26quot; on a coming alien invasion.%26quot; http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/0... The Cold Truth about Global Warming by Joseph Romm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_peti... dispells the myth about 17,000 scientists who are skeptics on AGW
http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfact...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
But there are articles going back a hundred years that talk about heating and cooling.
Global cooling is far more frightening than warming, because crops fail, people freeze, heating costs go up, etc. And it seems inevitable if past cycles continue through into the future.
The only problem is that cooling is not blamed on mankind. That is why warming got so much attention.
No one freaked or panicked over it. It was just nature and we would deal with it.
%26quot;Global Warming%26quot; is a 1990%26#039;s thing.
Bear in mind that was over 30 years ago, technology has advanced greatly since then.
