Additional Details
5 months ago
as a well thinking I ask you, if I drop a very poison substance into a big lake and the next day I give you a glass of water from that lake will that affect you? I don%26#039;t think so. The Earth is so big, and we are so small, the difference is too high to affect anything.* You must be logged into Answers to add comments. Sign in or Register.
Other Answers (9)
-
The scientists in the 10 national science academies that jointly drafted this statement say it%26#039;s real:
Joint Statement of Science Academies: Global Response to Climate Change [PDF], 2005
http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.a...
Key Points:
- Climate change is real
- Reduce the causes of climate change
- Prepare for the consequences of
climate change
The cause is too much carbon dioxide. It%26#039;s a gas, part of the air we breathe. It has no color, taste or odor. You will not notice it, but our crops will notice the change in climate and we will be challenged to produce enough food for the world%26#039;s population.
We know it%26#039;s warming, and we%26#039;ve measured how much:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science...
Scientists have a good idea how the Sun and the Earth%26#039;s natural cycles and volcanoes and all those natural effects change the global climate, so they%26#039;ve gone back and checked to see if they could be responsible for the current global warming. What they found is:
Over the past 30 years, all solar effects on the global climate have been in the direction of (slight) cooling, not warming. This is during a very rapid period of global warming.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/62902...
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media/pro...
A recent study concluded:
“the range of [Northern Hemisphere]-temperature reconstructions and natural forcing histories…constrain the natural contribution to 20th century warming to be %26lt;0.2°C [less than one-third of the total warming]. Anthropogenic forcing must account for the difference between a small natural temperature signal and the observed warming in the late 20th century.”
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104...
You can see this in the third graph here, where the dotted lines are just from natural causes, and the full lines are natural + human causes:
http://www.pnas.org/content/vol104/issue...
If that’s not enough to convince you the Sun isn’t responsible, consider the fact that no scientific study has ever attributed more than one-third of the warming over the past 30 years to the Sun, and most attribute just 0-10% to the Sun.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
So the Sun certainly isn%26#039;t a large factor in the current warming. They%26#039;ve also looked at natural cycles, and found that we should be in the middle of a cooling period right now.
%26quot;An often-cited 1980 study by Imbrie and Imbrie determined that %26#039;Ignoring anthropogenic and other possible sources of variation acting at frequencies higher than one cycle per 19,000 years, this model predicts that the long-term cooling trend which began some 6,000 years ago will continue for the next 23,000 years.%26#039;%26quot;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitc...
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/ab...
So it%26#039;s definitely not the Earth%26#039;s natural cycles. They looked at volcanoes, and found that
a) volcanoes cause more global cooling than warming, because the particles they emit block sunlight
b) humans emit over 150 times more CO2 than volcanoes annually
http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/Gases/man....
So it%26#039;s certainly not due to volcanoes. Then they looked at human greenhouse gas emissions. We know how much atmospheric CO2 concentrations have increased over the past 50 years:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mauna...
And we know from isotope ratios that this increase is due entirely to human emissions from burning fossil fuels. We know how much of a greenhouse effect these gases like carbon dioxide have, and the increase we%26#039;ve seen is enough to have caused almost all of the warming we%26#039;ve seen over the past 30 years (about 80-90%). You can see a model of the various factors over the past century here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Clima...
This is enough evidence to convince almost all climate scientists that humans are the primary cause of the current global warming. -
if Global warming is real then why am I so COLD
so Fake
(and republicans us scare tactics, HAHAHA) -
The CO2 concentration of the atmosphere is increasing because of the amount of oil and coal we use. That much is real.
The link between CO2 and warming seems quite overstated by the IPCC (who%26#039;s existance depends on it being overstated). It%26#039;s doubtful that it is having a measurable effect on the climate. -
The claim that AGW is a fake,is itself a fake! Only the oil companies want you to think that AGW is a fake!
Just what do you think pollution would feel like in the mountains? Can pollution even BE felt? Is that all you got for data to prove you claim? When are you going to publish your scientific findings in a %26quot;peer reviewed%26quot; paper? -
Fake.
-
The issue? Fake
-
The science is out and points to more other causes than meager CO2. Why not blame the black asphalt roads, buildings, air conditioning units, steam plants, batteries, the full moon? Simply CO2 is NOT THAT GREAT. It cools down every single solitary night. It cannot warm unless the sun warms it and it cannot store one single solitary bit of thermal energy whatsoever. Just like any other gas, it is at the mercy of the temperature around it. How they came to the conclusion that CO2 could do anything is absolutely nuts.
