Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
Most of global warming is NOT directly impacted by automobiles and internal combustion as a source of CO2.Mass transit only works in areas of high population like cities so lots of areas can%26#039;t use mass transit.
If you look you will find that most bus and transport systems ARE government, MTA or other transit districts. But government doesn%26#039;t have any money to pay for it. So they use taxes and bus fare to cover the costs...pay the drivers...buy the gas and pay for the bus.
But turn your question around: if cars have so much affect on global warming, why don%26#039;t YOU move to live where you work and eliminate the commute? Ride a bicycle instead of any kind of transportation. Walk to work/school. 33% 2 Votes
Other Answers (15)
-
but cars are not the major reasons for global warming, homes are, we use much more energy at home than in our cars.
0% 0 Votes
-
Another liberal heard from!!!!!
Yes dear the government should pay for your transportation. And housing, medical care, food, clothing, child care and twice a year they should pay for a vacation to a destination of your choice.
I know people who have been waiting there entire lives for the gubment to step in and take care of them. They are still waiting. I wasn%26#039;t nearly that smart. Silly me I went out and got an education, worked hard, started my own business and provided for myself and my family. Now 30 years later what have I got to show for it? All that hard work and all I got was wealthy.
And to think, I could have been patiently waiting for the gubment to take care of me. Oh, what a fool I have been. 0% 0 Votes -
Buses are waaay worse than cars if you%26#039;re worried about the environment!! It%26#039;s a different type of pollution. Anyway, the gov%26#039;t already does pay for public transportation (I%26#039;m assuming you%26#039;re in the United States and not on the east coast...) and it%26#039;s NOT the answer.
17% 1 Vote
-
They do. Most cities%26#039; bus systems are subsidized by the government.
17% 1 Vote
-
Many Govt. encourage CNG use,Green fuel,Pool car system
and subsidise to purchase EURO NORMS cars.But all are less effective.Stringent measures to be taken.Diesel driven
cars are to be banned.But who is to bell the cat? VOTE and
Voters are most powerful. 0% 0 Votes -
50% of greenhouse gasses are not CO2. Cars are a very small but important part of the sollution to GW. Improving energy standards on buildings, slowing the production of methane, burning less of everything, but most importantly we have to clean up our mees in the atmosphere. If we do our part Earth can take care of the rest.
0% 0 Votes
-
cars do...but there are so many other things that have an effect
0% 0 Votes
-
Well in my opinion bush is wack.And im not to political
0% 0 Votes
-
or even better, if they want us to buy us fuel-efficient cars, LOWER THE PRICE!!! seriously, not all america has a 200k salary!
0% 0 Votes
-
Cars themselves have very little to do with it by its operation. Were they become part of the scheme is by the refining of fuel. That when massive pollution is achieved at the production level.
That%26#039;s who the governments are protecting and constantly giving tax breaks and subsidies,Who is to blame???