The Discovery of Global Warming
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index...
This physicist%26#039;s own informed conclusion regarding on global warming:
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/SWnot...
The only %26quot;crock%26quot; involved is the propaganda that ExonMobil spews, creating the false appearance of debate:
Exxposing ExxonMobil%26#039;s Agenda: Manipulating Politics and the Public
http://www.exxposeexxon.com/facts/dailyf...
Denial is also viewed by some as an important public facade to maintain, for their personal gain:
%26quot;A recently leaked memo written by Frank Luntz, the US Republican and corporate strategist, warned that %26#039;The environment is probably the single issue on which Republicans in general - and President Bush in particular - are most vulnerable... Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly. Therefore, you need... to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue.%26#039;%26quot;
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/columnist...
Even the most skeptical scientists won%26#039;t put their money where their mouth is:
http://www.livescience.com/environment/0...
In 2005, Annan offered to take Lindzen, the MIT meteorologist, up on his bet that global temperatures in 20 years will be cooler than they are now. However, no wager was ever settled on because Lindzen wanted odds of 50-to-1 in his favor. This meant that for a $10,000 bet, Annan would have to pay Lindzen the entire sum if temperatures dropped, but receive only $200 if they rose.
“Richard Lindzen’s words say that there is about a 50 percent chance of [global] cooling,” Annan wrote about the bet. “His wallet thinks it is a 2 percent shot. Which do you believe?”
The well documented oil industry campaign to deny that that global warming is happening, or to claim that it is not harmful, is the crock.
Think about it... how much would the one degree of warming so far affect Minnesota%26#039;s winter temperatures of 40 below?
We need to do something about that.
So one place being colder than usual is in no way proof that %26quot;global warming is a crock%26quot;. Now if you average my +49 with your -40 and with every other temperature in the world from pole to pole and over the ocean, and then averaged that for every minute of every day for a year, and then plotted that average year by year for decades, and if some years are warmer but others are cooler but a least square fit is an upward trending line, then THAT is global warming. Even if the trend is only up 1/2 degree for 50 years, which is exactly what we ARE seeing.
People who think you can see global warming by today%26#039;s temperature at their home are being hopelessly naive.
-
Answer hidden due to its low rating
no its not a crock
