%26quot;The effects of a warmer climate alone would generally reduce wheat and corn yields. Yield changes range from + 15 to -90%.%26quot;
Here%26#039;s what they say happened in the past following crop yeild drops of %26quot;up to 50%%26quot;:
%26quot;Dryland farmers in the Great Plains are particularly vulnerable to climate variability. The Great Plains States of Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas were the hardest hit during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s (Worster, 1979; Hurt, 1981). Yields of wheat and corn dropped as much as 50% below normal, causing the failure of about 200,000 farms and migration of more than 300,000 people from the region.%26quot;
The report concludes that any small increase in crop yield due to increased CO2 will be overwhelmed by the negative effects of precipitation decreases and temperatures that are inadequately cool for crops such as wheat.
As a result of declining food production, here%26#039;s one possible scenario that the Pentagon has studied for global riots and anarchy in about 12 years:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/...
Already, according to Randall and Schwartz, the planet is carrying a higher population than it can sustain. By 2020 %26#039;catastrophic%26#039; shortages of water and energy supply will become increasingly harder to overcome, plunging the planet into war. They warn that 8,200 years ago climatic conditions brought widespread crop failure, famine, disease and mass migration of populations that could soon be repeated.
Randall told The Observer that the potential ramifications of rapid climate change would create global chaos. %26#039;This is depressing stuff,%26#039; he said. %26#039;It is a national security threat that is unique because there is no enemy to point your guns at and we have no control over the threat.%26#039;
Randall added that it was already possibly too late to prevent a disaster happening. %26#039;We don%26#039;t know exactly where we are in the process. It could start tomorrow and we would not know for another five years,%26#039; he said.
%26#039;The consequences for some nations of the climate change are unbelievable. It seems obvious that cutting the use of fossil fuels would be worthwhile.%26#039;
---
The Pentagon isn%26#039;t saying that it%26#039;s the most likely scenario for 2020, but we have no firm plan for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions of the two largest sources, China and the U.S., so we do seem to have a very bleak outlook for the future, whether it%26#039;s 2020 or some other date.
%26quot;The bottom line is that recent observations and research make clear the planet almost certainly faces a greater and more imminent threat than is laid out in the IPCC reports. That%26#039;s why climate scientists are so desperate. That%26#039;s why they keep begging for immediate action. %26quot;
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/0...
Let me guess, this country is rising with the water level.... ROTFLMAO
A new beginning with more empathy for the environment that we live in would be possible.
The AGW CLUB (aka %26#039;Flat Earth Society%26#039;) have jumped on Gore%26#039;s hoax like a fat boy on a cupcake.
Please don%26#039;t fall for it.
I have my flame retardant underwear on so all of you alarmists feel free to flame me with your name calling. Hopefully, some day one of you will actually make a logical argument instead of just the name calling...
