What is your take on the Global Warming Data? This youtube link below shows some CO2 emissions data. What do you believe it means. I see that natural cycles of the earth. It doesn%26#039;t seem political it just states facts based off of a couple years of observations. It is pretty detailed. What conclusions do you draw, and do you believe this solidifies or debunks global warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJpj8UUMT...

Additional Details

4 months ago

Well When I said I see natural cycles I am referring to the fact that In order for a CO2 to dissapate at such a rapid rate over night it would have to tell you that the concentration of CO2 we are creating is far less then the overall atmosphere. For instance putting a drop of red dye into an olympic size swimming pool will not change the color of the pool. Also is CO2 a pollutant? I guess what I was looking for in the data was something along the lines of Al Gore%26#039;s inconvienent truth. I wanted to see atmospheric concentrations increasing overtime, I didn%26#039;t see it. I saw them go up and down, higher in the summer lower in the winter.
Example if CO2 ppm goes from 4 to 5 then we have a 25% increase in CO2 concentration, but in terms of concentration that is still very very very very small. Does anyone follow my logic?

4 months ago

I meant to say far less than the overall atmospheric saturation level. what we create is highly concentrated compare to atmosphere, but when diluted it is like puting a drop of red dye into a swimming pool. The color of the water doesn%26#039;t change.
Antarctic ice core studies, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals between 1999 and 2006. The ice core data allowed researchers to examine multiple climate changes reaching back over the past 650,000 years. All six studies found atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations tracking closely with temperatures, but with CO2 lagging behind changes in temperature, rather than leading them. The time lag between temperatures moving up—or down—and carbon dioxide following ranged from a few hundred to a few thousand years.
Interesting how noting is mentioned about the Largest Sheet of ice the South Pole (S.P.) Besides Greenland, the S.P is the only other significant ice sheet. It should be noted that summer 2003, at the S.P., was the greatest summer extent of sea ice ever measured, and Antarctic sea ice is in an upward trend. The media instead has choosen to %26#039;cherry pick%26#039; the data and discuss only the Ross Ice Shelf which is the only portion of South polar ice in recession. Eventhough it represents less than 10% of the total aggregate ice in the S.P. the public is misled into thinking that ALL Regions of the S.P. reflect conditions found at Ross. Ask any penguin (massive die off) last year due to the ice being so far away out into the ocean from the breeding grounds, or ask any Russian inhabitant of Vostok (only time ever to be forced from Vostok base because supply ship could not get near shore) and they will tell you there is not much global warming at the South Pole. Ask a climate expert and they will smugly tell you that the models predict a no warming at the South Pole. That is, AFTER they changed the forecast for the South Pole. Original IPCC predictions called for %26quot;most the warming to be at the poles%26quot; then when the observations did not show this they CHANGED THEIR MODELS to predict no warming at the South Pole.

http://www.dhmo.org/

http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

http://www.snopes.com/science/dhmo.asp

global warming is a bunch of b.s.!!!!

• Answer hidden due to its low rating

  i feel bad for global warming. I watched this program and this government said it is caused by us. A lot of polar bears, penguins, and more are getting extinct! i love those poor creatures! i wish i could do something.