it cost 5 billion more a yr to use it then oil , they burn coal in the production of the ethanol
do any of these eco alarmist do research or just listen to what the government\ alarmist (money grubbing scientists ) tells them or do they do there own research?
do they realize it burns 24% less effectently then oil and you end up filling your tank more?
i was watch the broken government on cnn , so im not getting this from a right wing source it was CNN people
Also http://www.searleffect.com/free/TMWKD/TM...
is an eco geek an ECOnomist for the global corps? they are the only ones profiting from bio-fuels/right wing government subsidies, eg Cargill, monsanto...
It%26#039;s not a perfect fuel, and it%26#039;s not THE solution to our problems. The key is getting energy from lots of different things, not relying on one energy source for everything.
Re-inventing the engine, re-inventing the car, supplying everyone, and actually selling a new product to everyone isn%26#039;t something that can happen overnight.
Global warming is political, not scientific.
It costs $23/gal to produce petro ethanol and there is a $20 subsidy which is why gasoline coast $3+ right now, if it didn%26#039;t have the subsidy it would cost over $23/gal!
Corm ethanol only costs around $17/gal but it has no subsidy, so it looks like it costs more.
