Why haven%26#039;t we been told that there is NO scientific consensus regarding %26#039;Man-did-it%26#039; global warming??!!? A Canadian survey of scientists released on March 6, 2008 offered even more evidence that the alleged ‘consensus’ is non-existent. A canvass of more than 51,000 scientists with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA) found 68% of them disagree with the statement that ‘the debate on the scientific causes of recent climate change is settled.%26#039;%26quot; According to the survey, only 26% of scientists attributed global warming to “human activity like burning fossil fuels.” APEGGA’s executive director Neil Windsor said, “We%26#039;re not surprised at all. There is no clear consensus of scientists that we know of.%26quot;

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?F...

Additional Details

1 week ago

Antarcti said: %26quot;Any link that starts off referencing the 2008 climate conference in New York as %26quot;The event, which garnered significant international and U.S. media attention%26quot; should be taken with a grain of sand as it got little media attention as it quickly became obvious that few of those attending were actually scientists and the event was organised by the Heartland Institute.%26quot;

Kinda like the %26#039;Warmer%26#039;s%26#039; festivals??

You may attempt to discredit %26#039;non-lemming%26#039; (non-pro AGW) sources, but it is an ever-increasing (among Warmers) indication of desperation.
The Warmers need to wait until the science is in, and apparently you folks have a LONG way to go. The public is becoming fed up with the Madison Avenue tactics and pseudo-science used by many of the Warming cult!

Every day, more and more scientist are coming out against the man made theory. here is another expert who recently became a %26quot;denier%26quot;.
Internationally renowned climate sceptic and solar expert.

Dana,
Then you are saying that many of the IPCC researchers are not %26quot;real Scientist%26quot;? Here is one of my favorite lines from the article, %26quot;Our problem with their inclusion on the list of Contributors to the IPCC WGII Fourth Assessment report is that their jobs are (in order) website-designer, administrative assistant (x2), and network administrator.%26quot; Seriously, the admin assistants get included in the number of IPCC scientist.
http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/1... BB It is hard to get around a link to the original Appega paper, source of your very question and not address the point that only a 1000 or so people are involved not the 50 thousand claimed. Report Abuse No use in trying to reason with him. BB has no interest in facts. He just wants his mommy and Inhofe to soothe him with sweet sweet lies. Hey BB, if it makes you feel better, I know a dentist who doubts AGW too. Report Abuse

* You must be logged into Answers to add comments. Sign in or Register.

Other Answers (10)

• If you want somebody to lie to you, James Inhofe will be happy to oblige. Your mommy probably will too.
  
  %26quot;Earth scientists and engineers%26quot; are not climate scientists. I know a lot of engineers and geologists, and I know more about climate science than any of them (and I%26#039;m no climate scientist). Frankly I don%26#039;t care what they think. Unless you actively research a subject, you%26#039;re not an expert. http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/ne...
  
  doesn%26#039;t describe dana at all does it heretic?