Other Answers (17)

• Climatoligists had a big meeting in Australia last year, IIRC, and determined that over the next century the temperature would rise 3 degrees, and that without the human contribution, it would rise only two degrees. Humans were responsible for 1 degree in their opinion. The UN politicians then decided that wasn%26#039;t good enough, ad had their own investigation, in which they determined humans would be responsible for two degrees of warming, because it is hard to claim the government should control every detail of your life if humans are only contributing one degree.
  We would definitely have global warming with or without humans. But we would not have global warming hysteria. If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a noise?
  
  http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/glob...
• Global Warming, Global cooling, Global climate change. Sorry, but I%26#039;m to confused to answer your question!
• Yes, definitely, but there is a great deal of evidence that a) it would happen more slowly and b) we can help slow it.
• No, because it isn%26#039;t happening anyways. Too much hype over it.
• No we are on par with a 450,000yr average. What%26#039;s the problem?
• yes, stop with the games here.
• It did before, didn%26#039;t it?