Exmaples are: GeoThermal, Solar, Wind, Ocean Currents, etc...
Additional Details
9 months ago
I should have been more clear sorry....For power generation - nuclear
For heating and cooling my house - geothermal
For transportation fuels - good old petroleum
for automobiles the hydrogen can be better,
and for electricity, it would be nuclear Fusion reactors along with wind mills.
It all depends:
- on your location
- your budget
- your application %26amp; the kind of users
- the local availability of resources
- local electricity grid and gas grid connection
- the geology
- the weather
- the topology
- the level of technology.
- the required availability (e.g. wind power is not delivered on a continuous basis)
While solar is fine for New Mexico, Oregon has plenty of potential for biomass and wind.
The BEST is an intelligent combination of all of them to answer the demand
Example1: Batteries such as those use in hybrid vehicles - How are they produced? What is the enviromental impact of the manufacturing plant? How much CO2 is emitted flying/driving the batteries from the MFG. plant to the vehicle assembly plant? ... Can the batteries be reworked/ reused after the vehicles end of life?? Do they end up in a junkyard? How long does it take then to decompose? Do they every naturally decompose? If man must use chemical processes to assist decomposition, what are the enviromental effects of those processes?...
Consider the alternative energy source over its full lifespan, including disposal.
The tangential effects of alternative energy should be compared against those of the current means. (For example, the fertilizer pollution and effects of farming and production practices used to produce E85 should be compared with the effects of producing and using gasoline. Just because E85 is from plants, doesn%26#039;t mean it is good/better for the enviroment).
Face it, most coorporatoins (even green ones) are in the biz to make money. They will market to consumers how Great how Green they are. The devil is in the details.
So go out and investigate the full enviromental effects of those alternative energies before chosing the best one for the world.
My guess is geothermal or hydro power may be the best, but I have not scientific data proving so. We really need a scientist to show us hard data showing the full impact of the available techologies. (Can anyone tell us where to look??)
Until we have data, I suggest trying sources that you know are better than what you currently have. I also suggest to reduce, reuse, recycle. Everyone can do better at these 3 steps and have a huge impact.
Best Regards,
Chris
Alternative to what?
If it%26#039;s fossil fuel we are talking about, I would vest my efforts in Solar....it will last as long as we do and when it goes out....we won%26#039;t need it any longer.
Wind is cool but takes about 15 years to pay for itself
Geothermal is great if you own geothermal active property. If it%26#039;s subterranean housing you want, go for it...I like the idea of a constant 68 degree home.
Ocean current....not for the little guy, only corporate giants can harness that...by the time they give a new Lexus to all the staff and pay for the country club memberships, the energy will cost you just as much as black coal and crude oil.
