MIT%26#039;73 Chem Eng Which ignores the fact that nuclear waste can be properly stored so as to not become a major problem while also ignoring the fact that waste from other power sources (which should have been replaced with nuclear decades ago) is causing medical problems. Report Abuse
* You must be logged into Answers to add comments. Sign in or Register.
Other Answers (12)
-
People are afraid of the word. The past generation was petrified of nuclear from the moment the bomb was dropped. After that you had the cold war and after that Chernobyl and three mile Island. People have been so afraid that they don%26#039;t look at the real issues.
Chernobyl was an extremely unsafe designed and was only ever used in Russia(former soviet union-lets hope it stays that way). Three Mile Island actually worked in preventing a disaster in its design.
Nuclear can be used to provide safe clean energy.
However there are issues with the waste and there needs to be a way to reuse some of the waste. Secondly, there are growing concerns for security. http://www.eco20-20.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civ... -
If we can develop better ways to deal with the nuclear waste, then I%26#039;d have no problem with it at all.
-
Nuclear Energy when used makes Nuclear waste which is very hard to get rid of.
-
Because a handful of nutjobs in Hollywood have used their soapbox to scare the general public. Some of us are smarter.
-
I agree.. go nuclear.... its safe.. clean... leaves more oil for my truck ...
the air pollution savings would be fantastic... -
It%26#039;s more dangerous he fossil fuel, just look at Chernobyl!